Rome – pre-Christmas Clash between Pd and Forza Italy on the issue of reform. On the one hand Renzi and the Democrats insist on the need to approve the Italicum first and then think about the election of the new head of state, since the resignation of Giorgio Napolitano are expected not before mid-January. Other blues overturn the agenda of Prime Minister and pressed to resolve the issue before the Quirinal and then proceed with the election law and constitutional reforms.
Matteo Renzi this morning said it clearly to the assembly of the Democratic Party group in the Senate: “The reforms in the House by 31 January.” But Forza Italy, during the group leaders in the House, has put first the vote for the new president of the Republic and only after the reforms.
The leader of the Democratic Party in the House, Robert Hope, tried to cut short with a tweet:
And in the afternoon of the Nazarene sources stressed that the time for the approval of the electoral law are “absolutely compelling and urgent.” If “Fi or other they are going to go for long or do melina, the Democratic Party will go ahead anyway, strong numbers and determination for reform.” In short an either Forza Italy.
But in addition to public statements, the battle takes place under track, in a negotiation locked on a point that could wipe out every problem: the clause on entry into force postponed dell’Italicum. Matteo Renzi would put it at the beginning of 2016, Silvio Berlusconi, always suspicious on the will of the Prime Minister of the polls early, pointing to September 2016. Between the two, but no contact throughout the day between the vertices dem there were frantic negotiations to reach an agreement that goes well with both. Then in the evening, during a dinner with the deputies, the former Knight is back to talk publicly about reforms: “We are in opposition, but we vote,” he said. And he insisted factor Colle: “On the Quirinale serves convergence”. He repeated his version of the Nazarene on the pact – also includes the agreement on succcessore Napolitano – and predicted: “The new president will be to our liking.”
Italicum, vote in the House from January 8 . Meanwhile, the conference of leaders of the House ruled that the votes on amendments to the bill reforms will begin in the House to the House from Thursday, January 8th. The leaders also decided unanimously that the parliamentary groups will increase by 15% the number of amendments submitted so far on the constitutional bill amending bicameralism and Title V and the quota of the times in 80 hours.
Criticism Napolitano’s speech. In the aftermath of the speech given by Napolitano to the High state offices there have been criticisms . The Mattinale , the political note prepared by the staff of the group of Forza Italy in the House, said harshly: “Last night we witnessed the political masterpiece of Giorgio Napolitano – we read on the Mattinale – Yesterday issued instructions, warnings as heavy orders not by the Head of State (would be an affront to the Constitution), not as the supreme authority of the unity of the nation (as such he is not allowed to assume the role of head of the head of government). No, yesterday was the one who in the tradition of the Old Firm Red is the dominus of all Ambaradan, the Helmsman originators of the remaining functions, namely the Political Secretary of the Party. “
On the other side, Velina Rossa (information sheet Parliamentary headed by Pasquale Laurito) criticized the head of state for having slapped the speaker of early voting:
FILE Here is the Italicum
The Italicum . As to the electoral law, the new face dell’Italicum involves lowering electoral threshold, gender equality, the apparently no, a definite date for the entry into force but no to the transitional rule. And ‘this for Renzi’ the Italicum 2.0 ‘, according to reports on Twitter Senator dem Francesco Russo.
Surprisingly, after the rumors of recent days, the prime minister back then, back on the assumption of Mattarellum adopt the electoral system as a “bridge” pending completion of the institutional reforms. Remember that Constitutional Affairs Committee in the Senate did not pass the safeguard clause contained in the agenda presented by the League’s Roberto Calderoli to the electoral law: the document has been redrafted by the rapporteur Anna Finocchiaro (Pd), by deleting all the parts that referred to the Constitutional Court ruling that rejected the porcellum and was approved by a vote of all, including Calderoli, except M5s and Sel.
No comments:
Post a Comment