Rome – “I do not think that the decision has been taken in isolation, because it is a serious act. Our response is in place, with forms of protest and denunciation of this intervention a straight leg. We ask the lifting of the injunction. If the government were to maintain, we will respect it, but it is a serious act. ” Susanna Camusso, host of the Republic of videoforum TV, reacts well to the decision of the Transport Minister Maurizio Lupi, to call back to work the railroad that Friday would join the general strike called by the CGIL and UIL against Jobs Act, the law of stability, economic policy and industrial, non-renewal of the contract of public employees.
“We are considering, it does not end there because we believe it violates the law and there is an instrumental use of the law – observes the CGIL leader -. We have called the strike over a month ago. We have not had the text of the order, which we will evaluate. We have learned from the newspapers of the injunction. Then you ask us not to feed the conflict. ” “I should note – adds Camusso – as the procedures are not being met with unilateral acts that raise the tone of the conflict.” The general secretary of the CGIL will speak Friday morning in Turin, but the event, characterized by the slogan This will not do , will extend to more than 50 Italian cities.
In 20 years of Berlusconi never so many strikes as against Renzi. (demand by readers Rosario Giosa and Fulvio Castellani)
“It is not true, the long season of the governments of the center coincided with the largest number of strikes. We have always opposed. Then I understand, the question is legitimate by those who hoped that Renzi was the big change. But in the name of the hope we take the unfair dismissal? Are feelings that cross all the people of the CGIL and workers. The world of work can not give up work and rights. ”
“Dear Camusso, you managed to convince me to give notice to the INPS relatively restrained pro CGIL. It seems that nothing has changed since 1984 when the CGIL was in the streets against the repeal of escalator “. The question sums up what many think: CGIL today rearguard, better to remove the protections provided there is work . (demand from the player Enzo Reali)
“And ‘a country that has chosen to only compete on cost reduction, with a job that costs less and does not have rights. And’ an illusion which must be observed in individuals, poverty leads to certain behaviors. But the responsibility has to be that way that our country has become fragile. The real rearguard and great defeat would diminish the rights at work. Focusing on all reduced rights makes the country fragile and without development. There are all the elements to say that that way you get to forms of slavery and war among the poor “. < /p>
Even temporary workers deserve to be represented.
“We have told the government, receiving contempt: we need to reconstruct the work in Italy. There is little work in relation to demand, they say the digits. The choice should be to invest, starting from investments public. And all resources should be directed there. If you reduce the work are reduced rights. In Italy there is also a new phenomenon: a million people with a job, even full-time, it is still on the poverty line. We look into the policies of the government as it distributes wealth to generate work. It can react opposing austerity, not just saying it in Europe, but also doing it in Italy. While there is this strange dichotomy. “
Public employees who strike” only “for the contract. It attacks the” sense of responsibility “of those in the Democratic Party voted Jobs Act, in reference especially the minority dem. A list of “betrayal”. (demand by readers Nicola Verdicchio, Claudio De Biase and Maria Genova)
“And ‘the effect of a situation , a working world that has its own proposal, which is in conflict with those who did the work its central reference. This fragmentation is not good for anybody, the government hurts to fuel it. But this is the great theme: the work has no political representation, and also changes the relationship between the trade unions and parties. They reminded me of a disturbing similarity: the Labour Code of 1927 said that for unfair dismissal is the compensation, it’s back to that logic with the Jobs Act. But all is not countable, the dignity of people, for example. “
A study of the UIL shows that the measures of the Jobs Act will encourage to dismiss rather than to take.
“There is a strange and not very transparent discussion on decrees of Jobs Act. The Ministers have disappeared and this after Renzi had said he had to talk to the unions. After deciding that the road is monetization, we discuss how to save. And if everything is played on resources, it gives an advantage to companies that lay off, who pay little tax relief and who will be hired later. But with the protections growing, grows over time, even the compensation to be paid to new employees in case of dismissal. That the incentive to terminate that relationship as soon as possible. I see that part of Parliament has noticed this. And, in a normal country, should be obliged to change that pattern. “
Together with the general strike, there would also like another kind of strike, that of consumption? (questio n from a reader Angela Castellero)
“The question of the reader comes from a part of the country that communicates the sense of abandonment that test today. Also we ask ourselves on different forms. But specifically, the strike of consumption is already in place due to the crisis. Alternative forms of mobilization, a great suggestion. But, given the situation, I think we need to experience in other directions. “
The strike rests on a broad package of issues. On what would get a positive response?
“At work, a change of approach that puts all the resources and energies available to work for the future. Giving substance to that sense of hope that the government intends to give “.
But also the quality of work, to give hope to all those young people forced to flee Italy if they want to be appreciated for preparation and talent.
“Work and quality go together. In contrast to the idea of the work without rights, is implicit in the idea of the quality. You can build a path. You could use the flexibility in output pension. But it is essential to create jobs. “
It is striking that two women at the head of the trade unions, Camusso and Furlan, the new secretary of the CISL, have failed to create an understanding. Furlan did not rule on that some topics you can talk with the CGIL. Strange, whereas the CISL is not at all soft with Renzi.
“In fact, I believe that by the CISL there is a ruling, not on content but on ‘ we can not mobilize ‘. But I say that we can not even resign. If you believe that an interview with positive feedback arrive not going anywhere. We felt reproach that when the government was Monti we have done little. In the face of such an attack, you can not stand still. The CISL does not understand that our members would not understand the lack of response, I would interpret as a resignation. “
Maybe it would take a different approach. That is, the CISL going to strike” together “to CGIL, not “adhere” to the strike CGIL.
“In fact, we have discussed a lot. Our idea has been proposed, but there is a time to do things. And that time is now. If there are no answers have to draw the consequences. If workers have the right, you have to choose whether to exercise their ability to pressure to change policies or take a step backwards. Inoi we chose to take the step forward. The government Renzi may not know that they are cumulative effects that cause the reaction of the people. “
His judgment on Renzi.
” I think it has the about to have turned a great hope in this country. Now do not turn into fear evoking the Troika. Evoke that hope was also his fortune. Now translated into work. “
No comments:
Post a Comment