Tito Stock Exchange

But stop. Charlie Hebdo , the French satirical magazine known by the most just after the attack on January 7, 2015, made it clear that the Italian deaths are more important and deserve more respect of the French dead. We are referring in particular to two cartoons: the first, on the attack in Nice of 14 last July, representing a firework scattering blood on the present and the second, published after the earthquake It shook the center of Italy a few days ago, entitled Italian earthquake and depicting two survivors of the earthquake and the rubble burying the bodies with mocking captions Penne with tomato , Pasta gratin and Lasagne .

the earthquake victims count more than those of the massacre? Apparently yes, because the writer does not recall having seen in mid-July on social networks (and online editions of some newspapers) the disapproval that is now invading Facebook and Twitter after this cartoon. If half a year ago Charlie were all , now those who understand and support the satirical newspaper counted on the fingers of one hand. But, in fact, nothing has changed: Charlie Hebdo continues to satirize and in doing so continues to beat those who believed worthy of such beatings. If freedom of expression in a liberal state must have no limit if not incitement to violence, satire is (and should be) even more free because it is designed to be fun at times, but more often bad, grotesque, violent at large.

This speech should always be applied, and is independent of the judgment on the sticker in the mind of the writer: our judgment (as “our”) it can not be the yardstick for measuring the freedom of others . We defended Charlie Hebdo when he pilloried the Trinity (depicting Father, Son and Holy Spirit in a ménage à trois ) and the Prophet, we have not even noticed when the magazine was responsible for the massacre of Nice and now claim to have the right to be indignant because the mapped deaths are ours? This reasoning does not stand and can not stand: a succubus just thought of a self-centeredness (inclination to measure the world according to their own yardstick) rending can give birth to ideas like these.

Charlie Hebdo had, has and will continue to have the right to publish what it sees fit , targeting those who feels the need to target, and we will continue to have the equally sacred right not to buy it. It is the market to establish the rules of conduct of any company, even a newspaper. It may or may not like, but it is undeniable that it is so: If the French weekly manages to survive, it means that someone reads it and is therefore interested in what Charlie Hebdo public. Will you tell me that our right to live in politically correct worth more than the right to a Charlie reader to read what interests them?

The blog User Supporter hosts the posts written by readers who It decided to contribute to the growth of ilfattoquotidiano.it, signing the Supporter membership and becoming the Done social club members. Among the posts made Peter Gomez and drafting will select the most interesting ones are considered. This blog is the brainchild of readers, continue to make your space.

If you want to subscribe to participate in a voluntary subscription. So you can also watch live streaming the editorial meeting, by sending real-time tips, news and ideas, choose the investigations to be carried out by our reporters and you will have access to the entire paper file.