Tito Stock Exchange

But stop. Charlie Hebdo , the French satirical magazine known by the most just after the attack on January 7, 2015, made it clear that the Italian deaths are more important and deserve more respect of the French dead. We are referring in particular to two cartoons: the first, on the attack in Nice of 14 last July, representing a firework scattering blood on the present and the second, published after the earthquake It shook the center of Italy a few days ago, entitled Italian earthquake and depicting two survivors of the earthquake and the rubble burying the bodies with mocking captions Penne with tomato , Pasta gratin and Lasagne .

the earthquake victims count more than those of the massacre? Apparently yes, because the writer does not recall having seen in mid-July on social networks (and online editions of some newspapers) the disapproval that is now invading Facebook and Twitter after this cartoon. If half a year ago Charlie were all , now those who understand and support the satirical newspaper counted on the fingers of one hand. But, in fact, nothing has changed: Charlie Hebdo continues to satirize and in doing so continues to beat those who believed worthy of such beatings. If freedom of expression in a liberal state must have no limit if not incitement to violence, satire is (and should be) even more free because it is designed to be fun at times, but more often bad, grotesque, violent at large.

This speech should always be applied, and is independent of the judgment on the sticker in the mind of the writer: our judgment (as “our”) it can not be the yardstick for measuring the freedom of others . We defended Charlie Hebdo when he pilloried the Trinity (depicting Father,