The good school, there is mail to Renzi. Letter in response to that … – The Daily

->

Dear Prime Minister, today I received your letter. I know that was a letter-way. I know that I’ll get to her, his was only a communications . Yet we pretend that she does seriously, which intends to collect our observations. I read page by page the initial draft of the “ Good School ” I studied the proposed bill to the seventh Commission and now I have seen one by one, the amendments adopted and the text to this morning will review the House .

We enter the substance of the questions without stopping the demagoguery that she also used in the letter and in the video where he explains the reform on the board.

• She enjoys taking over hundred thousand temporary workers . I’m the first to give her reason could not give a place to all. He did well to clear the rankings while but now the problem is as you take on not so much how many it will take . Explains why Italy must be the only country in Europe to have a single person, the manager, to “propose assignments for teachers role assigned to the territorial reference” (Article 7 )?

Not only that, if as she writes in the letter that I sent yesterday, “no one can be fired after three years,” in the bill because you have specified that “the proposal of appointment by the executive will last three years “?

Again, she always writes that the principal” can not call her friend / or it chooses the winners of the competition “. Certainly, but identifies them among hundreds of people and among them there will be hundreds who will try the path of little phone call.

We remain on the assumptions : the his extraordinary plan are expected to be hired within the region for 50% winners of the competition, with the remaining 50% of the vacancies of those Gae. Those that remain will be hired within the limit of the places that might remain vacant on the staff of national autonomy, which means that a teacher of Mantua could end up in Palermo?

• We speak This issue of the “more money for teachers’ who has written on the blackboard and in the letter. Say € 40 million may seem a lot but I have a habit of doing four counts. Teachers in Italy are about 721,000. This means that we will have € 55 each for the training : a figure that is not enough to pay a return trip to Rome to attend a training course (leaving lose sleep over in our charge).

Let there is a fall in rain of 500 euro that some teachers may also be used to go to see the movie “Fifty Shades of Grey” (because nothing is specified by Article .10), maybe it’s a bit ‘risky. Would not it have been better if the government individuasse areas of training needed by investing there the 381,137,000 of EUR planned for card ? Let me suggest two areas: the study of English and digital training.

• We come to the about. Right, can not go to all the money earmarked for this goal. But to think that the Evaluation Committee is composed of two teachers chosen by the school board and parents as identified by the school board suggests that she does not know how they work (male) the corporate bodies . Perhaps it was unfair to let the teachers were democratically elected by them and so parents?

But let’s criteria for the development of the teacher . Among them is a dangerous word: “Based on the results obtained by the teacher in relation to the upgrading of skills of the students.” How can you measure this work? The teacher who works in a classroom where there are eleven of fifteen children with various difficulties, will be penalized? Today we highlight those teachers who are in these classes, classrooms where the pupils ‘skills are scarce and certainly not for the unworthiness of the professors.

• In Article 5 on’ digital innovation and educational , the bill cites the strengthening of teaching tools, teacher training, upgrading of network infrastructure and much more. To do all earmarks for 2015, 90 million euro in 2016 and thirty million. In all between 2015 and 2016 are 120 million. Here too it is worth making two calculations, taking the figure and dividing it by the number of educational institutions: it comes out about 14 thousand euro to institution, 2800 to plexus. And ‘certain that you can do whatever he planned with these figures?
• We face the question private schools . Why in the first text it was scheduled for the deductibility of expenses only for children and the first cycle of education and now also check the “as well as the school’s second grade”?
• She was held with Article 21 thirteen proxies to make legislative decrees, within a year and a half after the entry into force of the law, on matters of no small importance: it was no longer honest present Parliament with some of the laws that are already in the drawer see the issue differently abled and corporate bodies?
• In the bill there is a line on the Ata, what happened ? Or maybe it does not consider them within the education system?
• Maybe you should not then explain to me, let alone the unions but Italians because none of it to separate the assumptions and allow it to reopen a serious debate on the rest of the bill.

Appearance his answers, of course they will never arrive. But even this will when I go to vote.

Meanwhile, good job.

 
  ->