Why was it reopened the case of the murder of Chiara Poggi – Metro

Rome – And’ a trace of dna to re-open the case of the murder of Garlasco. Under the nails of Chiara Poggi was found a fragment that seems to have belonged to Andrea Example, a friend of the brother of the girl who was killed on August 13, 2007. During the investigation, the young man had been heard two times as a witness, without which the investigators were useful elements to prove his involvement in the murder. This example was entered in the register of suspects as ‘act’, after the complaint presented by the legal team of Alberto Stasi, sentenced definitively to 16 years in prison. Why Alberto Stasi is in jail Here the reconstruction of the stages of the case made by the Nla and the fotostoria made by the C ourier.it, from the day of the murder. The Supreme court on the 21st of June last, and laid the reasons for the judgment which will take place in December 2015, had confirmed the sentence to 16 years in second grade and in which he argued that Stasis was guilty “beyond a reasonable doubt”. Clues such as “the tesserae of a mosaic” that “have contributed to create a framework convergent with the guilt,” wrote the Fifth section of criminal law. But because, according to the judges of the Supreme court, Stasis was guilty? Logical consequences – “Many items, considered to be without illogicià, safe valence circumstantial were evaluated globally” Fit perfect – “Each clue is integrate perfectly with the other like pieces of a mosaic”. A framework of this kind “does not leave any space to alternate versions with the rationality and plausibility of practice,” Rejected the thesis of the defense – are No t sustainable “the versions envisioned by the defence of the accused or of the fact, however, mine, analyzing the life of Chiara, her acquaintances, her family” The alibi does not stand up – The version of Stasis “does not delete it from the scene of the crime in the ‘time window’ that is compatible with the commission of the murder”. But then who killed Chiara? Once again, the Supreme court has no doubts: “a known person, on my own bike, which she did enter the house”. Someone who knew the house”, as inferred also from the path to the inside of the rooms on the ground floor”. The ‘sins’ of Stagnation For the judges of the Supreme court, the boyfriend of Chiara Poggi has made several false steps: “made a story incongruous, illogical and false, as the discovery of the lifeless body of his girlfriend” “He claimed to have crossed to race the different rooms of the house look Clear, but on hi s boots, has not been found a trace of blood, neither the blood stains on the floor were changed by her passing,” “not Even on the floor mats of the car on which he himself claimed to be ascended immediately after the discovery of Clear, have been found traces of blood,” “The tale of how the discovery of the body of Light (the visible part of the face white, instead of completely covered in blood) is very similar to that of the aggressor, not of the discoverer”. The Supreme court has also for the investigators According to the judges, the progress of the investigation was “certainly not clear, it is also characterized by errors and superficiality”; “abnormal” to the “choice not to seize the immediacy of the ‘bicycle black woman’ of the family Stasis, or at least photograph it, and to seize, instead, away, a week by the facts, two bicycles, of which at least completely different from the one described by the two witnesses and on which are then focused all of the findings made in the course of the reviews up to that of referral”. Such a choice, observes the Supreme court, “and was correctly identified as an event that has had undoubted negative impact on the progress of the investigation”: the failure to capture ‘all’ the bikes in the availability’ of the family Stasis at a distance of few hours from the facts “can certainly be said – reads the judgment filed today – a missing link in the activities of the investigation carried out in relation to the murder of Chiara Poggi”. That was why he had Stasis to kill Clare? For the Supreme court there was cruelty in the crime, the result, probably, of an “act of passion”. “The mode of the fact, characterized by a rapid succession of hammer blows to the head of the victim, the assault of the assassins at the entrance of the house, with anger and emotion, an expression of a relationship of intimacy triggering emotion”. AGI