Guidi case, the hard Cuperlo attack Renzi – L’Espresso

“Only in Italy for public works work more lawyers laborers,” is the cliché that dusts off Matteo Renzi to the direction Pd, returning the case of amendment of Tempa Rossa and the resignation of Federica Guidi, who left the government after the publication of an interception in which the minister gave the news preview approval of an amendment to the law of stability and reassured his companion, interested contractors at work.

Matteo Renzi returns on each other with a rich slide action and studied attacks. The minority dem, as usual, and the judiciary, with a repertoire here now consolidated, while claiming a difference from the sample of matter, Silvio Berlusconi: “We are not the ones of such failure,” says Renzi, “we want the process , we want it now. ” The opposition, however, is clear: “It’s a blast,” he says later the prime minister, “see with Berlusconi and the National Magistrates Association.” In attacking his government, is meant, even if Renzi does not resume direct theses of the most radical among its reported these days by some newspapers: at Palazzo Chigi that of magistrates would be read just like an assist researched the movement of No triv.

No Triv associations which oversee the direction of the Democratic Party, although kept at a distance, in the nearby Piazza San Silvestro.

 To them and to the opposition that caters Renzi’s response to the allegations, internal and external, who paints him and his government as too careful, definitely, to the desires of big business, “ Multinational are a part of the economy of our country that creates jobs, “says Renzi then adds sarcastically:” These ministries speak with multinationals, we are told. Yes. Do you think that strangeness, I meet entrepreneurs’. The move is good for a first attack on the minority dem and a compliment to Mr. Marchionne: “We do not want to fall into the idea that those who do business is fundamentally bad, I hope,” says Renzi yet, “I remember the discussion of Marchionne, huh. We can do it again if you want. “

The case Guidi and on the referendum minority replica . And it does so with increasingly dramatic. But banging on the wall raised by deaf renziani. Such as Emanuele Fiano which by going to the direction of the Democratic Party, anticipates few minutes later a concept expressed by the Renzi: “We have drafted a law on conflict of interest that is among the most stringent d ‘ Europe, with which the Guidi case there would never have been, “says Fiano. And what you may be asking is why do not you both acted as if that law was already there, and it was stopped in the Senate, and why many possible conflicts of interests are Federica Guidi only become an issue with the publication of the call with her boyfriend. “The problem is not a call inopportune,” it says Gianni Cuperlo .

Renzi his version he has given in recent days, claiming not only the appointment of Guidi, guilty only “an inopportune phone call”, in fact, but also the same amendment. The government says in essence Renzi-intervention rally, you do not need the pressure of the energy companies to authorize a pipeline: “I always said I was in favor of the works that are for Tempa Rossa,” he said several times Renzi. Not only. Renzi, with slide notes, explains how the government wants to give up coal but no oil and gas, at least not as long as the technology does not allow to bet ‘obviously’ around the solar and wind power. And it is on this Emiliano replicating that the referendum does not require the immediate closure, but maturity and no longer automatically renewed for as long as, platforms, only those within 12 miles.

” he never got to judgment. A civilized country is a country that goes to judgment. “So the Prime Minister Matteo Renzi said the investigation of oil in Basilicata during his speech to the direction Pd

 For Cuperlo and the defense of minority dem Renzi – who then is actually an attack – still not enough: “Do not just say that amendment I wanted it,” he says Cuperlo but in addition to demand more internal comparison does not explain the concretely what we would need. The intervention of Cuperlo however hard and evokes more than ever the risk splitting. Indeed, the abandonment, since the split is always denied. “This party,” he says, “does not have much of what has driven me to choose him. And you can also answer saying “hello”. ” And then: “you’re not showing up to the role that you cover, you’re not showing the stature of a leader even if you cultivate the arrogance of the leaders.”

Gianni Cuperlo, in his speech at the Democratic party national leadership, did not mince words against Matteo Renzi accusing him of damaging the party. “I am convinced that, fortunately, the left is larger and richer than all of us, it seemed right to say these things in the face,” she concluded the deputy Dem

 Immediately echoed Robert Hope : “Here we are at the limit, it can not be more, that I write the militants,” adds the former parent company, ‘your voicemail has been wholly inadequate. ” The management, however, approve by a large majority the report by the Secretary. 98 yes and only 13 against, with lots of treacherous curtain of Orfini and Renzi that recount the contrary, that go from 10 to 13: “Ah well,” says Renzi with backpack already shoulder. Foreclosed is the agenda with which the minority urged the voters of the Democratic Party to participate in the referendum.

Cuperlo and Hope are so content with timid opening obtained on the rules of engagement for the referendum of April 17. The line remains the abstention, but individual members can feel free. Says Renzi, strong, behind him, a poster of the DS that, in 2003, invited to abstention on the referendum: “None of us it’ll abjurations or excommunication to those who have a different position, but the position of ‘ abstention is sacrosanct and legitimate.

<'p> and it is this freedom that Enrico Rossi , President of Tuscany, which did a little thought to the secretary dem, who finally tells you how to vote, “I I will vote yes in the referendum of April 17, “he says, so taking the part of Emiliano (protagonist of a tough operation, in the direction). Matteo Renzi, however, said that his position is rather that of Romano Prodi who recently said “if I vote no.” It does not need much more to confirm that the referendum on drills and then the administrative Renzi are a delicate step. “They know very well,” is the obvious analysis of a representative of bersaniana minority, “that if they lose Rome and Milan, where he is not going just fine, it will be difficult to redo speeches like today.”