civil unions, confrontation in the Democratic Party – The Messenger

In the old days they called “moratorium” and never has a right half day. It has now become “time out” but the conclusion is always the same. The pause for reflection asked yesterday by Matteo Renzi has not stopped the skirmishes at home Pd on civil unions. Not that the premier had expected something different but, referring to parliamentary sources of the Democratic Party, the Prime Minister continues to dislike excess of dem senators tones on the matter.

Finally the interview, then denied, Monica Cirinnà. The first morning in the Senate was “all a fury” against the senator with cattodem-renziani enraged. Luigi Zanda with Andrea Marcucci and Franco Mirabelli came out with three statements about what to groped to throw water on the fire.

The state of relations in the Democratic Party is that after weeks of confrontation, without success, on civil unions . Even today cattodem back to the office on the dropping of the stepchild. It is expected tomorrow an interview by Giorgio Tonini in this regard. While the ‘young Turks, who at Palazzo Madama count a troop of 16 senators, called a press conference to reiterate no to any suggestion to drop.

Renzi, developing in Brussels for the European Council continues silence on the affair civil unions. “It is plausible that make some reference frame,” the assembly of the Democratic Party on Sunday 21, he says, but no one trusts that the President of the Council will pull a rabbit out of the cylinder. Renzi wants the law to be approved, but the numbers in the Senate are the ones that are.

Of course, attacking the minority, in other cases the prime minister has used a very different force to impose itself. “On civil unions Renzi I expect the same determination that has had on the electoral law and the Jobs Act. Just wait,” Hope attacks. As for the stepchild, is clear: “They are inalienable.”

But the dismissal at the time, really is the last hypothesis. “It would open more problems than it solves. And then he says: ‘we take the stepchild and do a comprehensive reform of adoptions. All hell broke loose … “, is observed in dem environments. Undersecretary Luciano Pizzetti is clear: will the classroom to talk. “The word excerpt is blasphemy. Then there will be the votes of the classroom. “

In the next few days, until the last minute useful as always, will continue to keep open all roads. By bilateral disarmament of all the amendments’ kangaroo, or political will or regulation, or if it decides the president Pietro Grasso. Until the unpacking of ‘including kangaroo. But grillini not even want to hear about this solution.

“No, unpack amendment Marcucci, because it would still be a kangaroo and it makes no sense, is unconstitutional,” said the leader M5S in the Senate, nunzia Catalfo, coming to the House for the joint meeting of the parliamentary 5 Stars. That wrecked the day before yesterday “is an amendment premissivo, as was that by Esposito on constitutional reforms, and is unconstitutional, it can not endorse a technique of this kind.”

From the front centrist, meanwhile, continue the ‘Sirenè to the Democratic Party. Hopefully, said Renato Schifani, “that the pause for reflection could lead to new agreements which, through changes to the text, realize large shares with certain majorities in the classroom” rather “comes strongly suspect that there is no will to overcome the critical aspects and divisive of the measure, such as the stepchild adoption, but to overcome on this issue despite the legitimate differences of thought within the democratic Party. We hope to be wrong, and we look forward to verify the results of this suspension. “

An agreement with the PD, then betrayed, to vote for the so-called kangaroo and bring home the vote on civil unions?

 “Do not I know,” meanwhile, he says the parent M5S Senate Nunzia Catalfo, entering in the House to take part in the assembly joint. To those who pointed out that Senator Monica Cirinnà claims to have received a message from the 5 Star Alberto Airola who reassured her about it, “Airola is a senator – responds Catalfo dry – I do not know it has expressed its opinion. But the M5S is a group that decides the line together, the line which is then expressed by the parent company. I currently clothe this role and with me no one has ever spoken of agreement. If now the law puts at risk – he adds – is not the fault of the M5S, but the Democratic Party because, obviously, within them there is someone who does not want to take it forward. But not to discharge blame on us. “

” I can not express himself, “the whole group offline, and in any case,” I never guaranteed our kangaroo ok, especially in a scenario that sees 500 amendments. There was an exchange of text messages, contacts, exchanges, but on different scenarios … “instead says the same Senator M5S, Alberto Airola.

         

             Thursday, February 18, 2016, 19:43 – Last Updated: 23:29
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED