Rome – The path of the Bill Woods on the reforms, which will resume in September from the Palazzo Madama, is intended to be impervious. At least judging by the huge amount of amendments presented in the Senate in the last hour: a large front and heterogeneous aimed at a single purpose, to get elected to the Senate. Throughout the examination of the Constitutional Affairs Committee has presented us amendments 513,450, a record, as reported in a tweet by the Senate. A kind of front antirenzi enclosing all opposition more 28 senators of the minority Democratic Party. But Matteo Renzi shows quiet: “The majority is never missed and never miss seeing the numbers”.
Yesterday was the Northern League, Roberto Calderoli, to announce “half a million” of amendments (exactly 513,450). Just the Northern League senator, in a post on Facebook, announced that it has prepared, for consideration of the classroom, 6,500,000 of amendments “to scuttle the reform, the legislature and send home at last Captain Fracasse Renzi”.
relating to amendments leaguers are added those presented by Sel, 1043, more than twenty other component of the Mixed Group ‘Other Europe Tsipras’. Then there are those of Forza Italy, 1075, including some for the direct election of senators, faces, as explained by the leader of the Senate blue Paolo Romani, to return “legitimacy” and “representation” in the Senate.
A member of Ala (the new formation of Denis Verdini), Vincenzo D’Anna, has presented his amendment to a Senate consists of 157 senators, plus five appointed by the president, elected by “direct universal suffrage”. However, this is a stance in their personal capacity, clarify the Verdi. Are 194 proposals for amendment of the M5S: the Five Stars insist especially for substantial changes to the policy of elective Senate and balance of power between the government and Parliament. People come from Area 11 amendments, to do (the Senators close to Flavio Tosi) 259, the Group of Autonomy (in whose ranks are not lacking leaders favorable to the Senate elective, as reported by the socialist senator Buemi) 45.
But the proposals on which are focused the spotlight are those of the minority dem, who presented 17 amendments, of which there are requests for changes in Article 2 on the composition and election of the Senate, of changing the functions of the Senate and on future ‘election of the President of the Republic. A rising so large, that of the pro-Senate elective, as to tell the senator dem dissident Vannino Chiti that “there would be conditions for broad agreement” about this change. According to a first, theoretical, counting a Senate elected by citizens can count on an initial basis of at least 141 senators by adding minority Democratic Party, the group of autonomous, Sel, M5S, Forza Italy, League and Senator D’Anna Ala.
They are instead the 46 amendments tabled by individual senators of the Democratic Party, not representing the minority dem, but no substantial changes regarding the current setting of the text of the bill. “The Senate is elected by the citizens on a regional basis, ensuring gender equality, to coincide with the election of regional councils” reads the text of one of the three proposals to amend the minority dem. “What is new is an electoral law in which you get, unfortunately, to a room dominated by a single party and made mostly of appointed. With the election law there is no need for a Senate in which you return the word to citizens to choose senators, “he said one of the leaders of the minority dem Robert Hope . The numbers, therefore, for approval of the reform without upsetting the plant voted in first reading in March, begin to be uncertain.
In the debate on reforms intervenes Assistant Secretary dem Debora Serracchiani : “We are committed to a path of reform so important that if the other political forces will want to discuss we will always be available. If they want to, participate. It is not a covenant of the Nazarene but a commitment to involve all the forces in parliament,” he said the governor of Friuli Venezia Giulia. A clear reference to the possibility of a new deal on reforms with Forza Italy, as reported today on Republic, although Serracchiani has ruled out a 2.0 Nazarene talking instead of “a commitment and a responsibility to the country and all political forces “.
A concept also reiterated other secretary dem, Lorenzo Guerini , who stressed:” Paletti very clearly define the procedure for constitutional reform. We are always available to confront and bring improvements to the text, but we say that changes are possible as long as they do not carry over to the zero point on the path of reform. We hope there is the responsibility of all political forces to get to the end of this path. “
The reforms are also central to the party National Unity, to be held in Milan from 25 August to 6 September, where they will present all the ministers of the government and the opposition forces “because the festival is devoted to reforms and we want that develops a broad debate, “explained Serracchiani, on a day marked also by the Democratic Party leadership devoted to the policies for the South and the RAI, after the election of the board of the company in Viale Mazzini and the appointment of Monica Maggioni for president .
The issue of reform is also one of the topics of the traditional letter of greeting before the holidays of the Democratic Party leader in the Senate Luigi Zanda : “On the senators and senators of the Democratic Party weighs a very large part of the responsibility of keeping this difficult and critical legislature. Without your work in committee and in the classroom, we would never be able to get the approval of many important measures “. Then Zanda asks senators, in view of the examination of Bill Woods on reforms,” to maintain a strong commitment to collegiality “and to” make every effort so that the thorniest issues are addressed and resolved in committee. We understood that deal directly in the classroom nodes politically delicate produces, inevitably, political disorder, confusion between the majority and the opposition and, most importantly, no substantive result “.
No comments:
Post a Comment