The judge regent, the public Prosecutor of Aosta, Easter Longarini, best known for being years ago, with the colleague Stefania Cugge one of the two pm process to Annamaria Franzoni for the crime of Cogne, was arrested yesterday at the request of the public Prosecutor of Milan for the offence of “inducing undue to give or promise utility” and of “aiding and abetting”: the charges for which the gip Giusi Barbara has received house arrest, asked by the public prosecutor Roberto Pellicano in respect of the magistrate and of a coindagato entrepreneur, Gerardo Cuomo, owner of the “Dairy Aosta” Pollein that also exports to France and Switzerland. Throughout the day the pm is the military of the Core of tax Police of the Guardia di Finanza of Milan have been reported on a trip to Aosta to carry out searches and interrogations in parallel with the execution of the restrictive measure a load of the pm Longarini that, when the pr evious director of the office Marilinda Mineccia was passed in Novara, italy, is taking place in Aosta, the functions of the chief prosecutor, waiting for the Csm to appoint the new choosing between competitors (including itself).
The arrest of Longarini: suspected of a triangle of benefits cross
The first accusation, that of “induction improper to give or promise utility” (6 to 10 years), would be based on the protest to the pm of an offence modelled on a sort of triangle of benefits cross. Longarini, in fact, was the proprietor of a criminal proceedings against an entrepreneur in the hotel for crimes of a fiscal nature. And according to the hypothesis accusatory would have proposed a way to cushion the risks of the investigation (in the form of a solution of the side of the criminal in front of an immediate payment, the administrative headquarters) on condition that the proprietor for some categories of goods had gone to obtain supplies from an entrepreneur friend of the judge, the entrepreneur, however, (according to what was picked up by the surveys) and in relationships with environments contiguous to the clan of the 'ndrangheta. It would sortie intense negotiations between the two entrepreneurs, the outcome of which the owner w ould have actually signed a contract to receive from another contractor (friend of the judge) supplies to the value of about 70-100 thousand per year. The investigation, which has used the testimony of the proprietor and monitored the pm with phone hacking, which would also have identified a holiday with entrepreneurs at no cost to the pm, the episode, however, is not inserted in an indictment to the part.
Disputed even the “aiding and abetting”
with respect to the second hypothesis, “aiding and abetting”, Longarini is charged with having supplied to the contractor (the friend and beneficiary of the previous triangle) news of a survey carried out by the Direction of Antimafia District of Turin.
In the coming days, the analysis of eavesdropping
Only in the next few hours, or through questioning or through those who are his advocates, it is conceivable that the magistrate oppose to the allegations in his representation of the facts, as well as in the next few days you will be able to understand if and how much the intercepts are able to confirm the testimonies. In theory, in fact, the defence of the pm, which can take place on two floors. Or on the merits, claiming their irrelevance and, indeed, pointing at as the innocent victim of two entrepreneurs who have “been in the middle of” without his knowledge, namely, that for their purposes, would have assigned roles, in reality, never had, nor millantati. Or in the legal qualification, selection from Milan to frame the facts: “Ruby-Berlusconi in then, in fact, has shown all its complexity the new crime of “inducing a misappropriation to give or promise utility”, introduced by the law Severino in 2012 with the release of the old “extortion” (the crime of the public official that uses their position to take a utility), which first met in the self-mode “for construction” is that “for induction”. So much so that, before the guidelines immediately different, already in 2013-2014 the United Sections of the Supreme court had to intervene to give a first compass.
January 30, 2017 (amending the January 30, 2017 | 23:21)
© REPRODUCTION RESERVED
No comments:
Post a Comment