The former president Authority’s peremptory: “I do not want to jeopardize my professional image.” He and Violante at the center of yet unsuccessful negotiations between the majority and the opposition
” I thank the Members who voted for me, but I ask them not to further support my candidacy “for the Consulta. This was announced by Antonio Catricalà. “I would not jeopardize my professional image, and I hope that Parliament can more easily overcome the conflicts that have so far hampered the election of the two Constitutional Court judges,” he concludes. The withdrawal of willingness on the part of Catricalà comes after days of negotiations, but without results. The joint Houses in joint session can not, in fact, to elect two judges to the Constitutional Court, which should replace the components “expired” at the end of June: Luigi Mazzella and Gaetano Silvestri.
Surprise: the two candidates’ safe “do not make it
The two candidates, on which it was said that the political forces would have no difficulty to converge, Luciano Violante and Antonio Catricalà, had not reached for the third time in a row, the expected quorum of 3/5 of the components, ie 570 votes. The former House Speaker has received “only” 468 While the former head of the Antitrust they arrived 368 Both results are not enough to open the doors of the Consulta. On the CSM, the Parliament succeeds in his business only by electing a half after six black smoke, three of the eight candidates: the current undersecretary of the MEF, John Legnini; former Vice President of the Chamber Antonio Leone (Ncd); the former head of the Justice Margaret and mayor of Arezzo, Giuseppe Fanfani. On the other five all still seems on the high seas. Especially since the agreement on the CSM seems inextricably linked to that of the Consulta.
Stall also on the CSM Well
Teresa (Pd) received 480 votes; Elizabeth Casellati and Luigi Vitali (FI), respectively, 473 and 451; Renato Balduzzi (Sc) 462; Nicola Colaianni (M5S) 425; Alessio Zaccaria (M5S) No 127 has broken the quorum of 490 votes. So the Parliament in joint session to be replicated. And the presidents of the chambers, Boldrini and grease, already in the last hour had responded to the call of the Head of State of last week proclaiming the vote indefinitely until the completion of the teams to Consult and CSM, have set the next meeting for Monday 15 September at 15 So they drafted a note at the end of the day when it comes to “urgent requirement” and from which emerges a visible irritation that may be common with del Colle in recent days that he had tried to whip the political forces to respect the constitutional commitments.
Chaos Force in Italy
But the weekend may not be enough to restore order to the parties in the forest of the vetoes that poison the climate for these elections. In FI, for example, there is talk of a rift reassembled hardly seen that a part of the party did not vote for Catricalà, official candidate of Berlusconi and Letta, preferring another forzista foreground, Donato Bruno, who arrived 120 votes: some of which probably also from the Democratic Party and the League. Berlusconi, say his, it would be rather irritated by the “internal revolt” that “can not expect to impose a party line” and would ask Catricalà not to take the step back he already feared after the negative vote. The candidacy of former undersecretary at Palazzo Chigi was not very welcome even among democrats and centrists. In addition, there are also those who claim that the Councillors of State, already being able to vote one of its members to the Court, with Catricalà would definitely “over-represented”.
Problems for Violante, receiving preferences from blues and Ncd, it would not be failed to make full in the Democratic Party.
No comments:
Post a Comment