Among the malignant there are those who whispered that the unusual delay (over two months) of the expulsion of Pizzarotti is due precisely to this: the fact that in the foreseeable controversy judicial seguir à the movement 5 Stars could go the same way it is doing in Rome or Naples . A few days ago we talked about Mario Canino and how the court of Rome has definitively canceled his expulsion from Rome M5S. Now it is the turn of the Neapolitan activist group gathered around the insignia of Naples Free . They too had been driven out, but on the eve of comunarie of Naples. They too were readmitted by the judges of the Section VII of the Naples Court ( Lucio Di Nosse, Stanislaus De Matteis and Angelo Napolitano ): a partial victory pending a decision on the merits. But the contours of the order do not bode well against dell’allegria of 5 Stars management.
the decision of the court of Naples on the Naples group Free and the movement 5 Stars
Naples Free: deleted expulsions from M5S
the complaint was brought by Elio D ‘Angelo, Gaetano Musella, Luca Iadanza, Sara Wake, Mariano Fergola, Vittorio Ranzo, Vincenzo Del Duca, Pacifier Pasquale, Gennaro Luca Capriello, Anna Caparro, Alfonso Ciardiello, Antonio Ciccotti, Angela Daidone, Massimo Acciaro, Domenico Capasso, Vincenzo Galicia, Paola Staffieri, Marco Sacco, Romeo Genovino, Rita Mondello, and are represented by lawyers and Francisco Lorenzo Borre Tree. They were accused “of having participated in Naples secret group free to manipulate the comparison for the formation of the choice of the method and candidate for mayor of the Naples municipal list”.
the ordinance on Naples Free and M5S
the judges He proved them right, “must be regarded as circumstantial evidence of illegality determining the expulsion of today’s claimants adopted by management of Beppe Grillo” because they write are judges, no one was authorized to act in that way according to the Articles of Association do not. And the Regulation of 2014, which regulated the eject method among grillini, goes against the law. But there’s more: explains the court that although the M5S is not defined political party , in fact any association with joints in the area that has as its goal to contribute to the determination of national politics can define party. And for this there is a political and moral right to the associated not be excluded without urgent cause or without the guarantees of a decision-making process in conformity with the law .
the ordinance on Naples Free and M5S
Two features that the M5S has not , according to the judges of the civil court of Naples. why the judges welcome the complaint and suspend the execution of the expulsion pending the conclusion of the story. the decision is therefore provisional, because the merits of the case will take months and its outcome is uncertain. Meanwhile, however, the winds seem willing to ask readmission.
the “legal earthquake” in the Movement 5 Stars
the decision is “an earthquake for M5s – according to the law of attisti Borré who speaks ANSA -, because it falls on the scaffolding on which they are based hundreds of expulsions and the same suspension Pizzarotti. “Those of Naples Free exult on their Facebook page and ask resignation from the directory of Robert Fico , the long arm that was behind their expulsion:
After about five months, today, July 14, 2016, the truth is restored:
expulsions are illegitimate!
the Court of Naples, during the pre-trial brief cognition, declared illegal the Regulations of 2014, slowing down the whole legal structure of the Movement 5 Stars and l ‘ plant that has allowed so far, the ‘expulsion of hundreds of activists.
the “house of cards” with which he tried to “control” the hope of 9 million citizens has collapsed!
democracy is not screaming, you practice!
to whom, then, has turned a blind eye, or worse, has “facilitated” or “advantage” of ‘legal and illegal “political meanness,” I say: “the time of “apology” is finished! “
Now that the” Bastille “is taken, home makers!
# ficodimettiti
Ps: next week will hold a press conference.
PS: “Does the Board that in this precautionary measure we should give preference to ‘interest of the excluded not to see affected, right now, pending the substantive proceedings, their right to participate in the political life of the Movement, perhaps by an antagonistic position with respect to the leadership line. “
democracy is no comparison! Mettetevelo head
Meanwhile, all the old expelled and suspended the current sharpening their weapons. Knowing that decisions like this or like that of Mario Fang will jurisprudence. On the other hand, the slogan was “ One goes one “. Or not?
No comments:
Post a Comment