The minority of the Democratic Party, meeting in Bologna, has already rejected the proposal to set up a social area proposed by Landini to counter the political subordination Government with Confindustria.
Landini, especially through the transmission Matrix, was clear in “diagnosing” the disease by identifying, in the action of government, an attack on workers’ rights in particular as regards all implantation of the Workers’ Statute that has been put into question by the Jobs Act.
But Landini also takes issue with the association that he is saying that now more than ever you need a “ renewal of the union “
Here we are at the heart of the matter: the role that trade unions can play in this whole operation of” recovery of the rights canceled by Renzi. “
If we are not mistaken, the union strategies are decided fora statutory trade union organizations, from congresses to meeting management, not outside rather using terms contrasting with the unions themselves
The Secretary of Fiom, despite having identified the critical points on the attack Renzi, has not clarified what instrument is to counteract the action “ antisocial and Confindustriale Government ” if you do not say that it will give effect to the decisions made by Fiom and of which he is only spokesperson inviting “associations and movements” to a mobilization that’s not clear, but probably does not even know Landini, where desire result.
The split of the Democratic Party? The birth of a new party? The transformation of the union into a political force?
These questions Landini has not responded indeed was prudently cautious and took care to state that “ Fiom remains only a union “, who does not see the need for a new party but goes to ask, to those interested, to participate in “ a social coalition to defend workers’ rights .”
Sorry Landini but the union is not appointed to this?
So what is the need to do all this noise, that the substance could also be shared, if everything has to be reduced to “ battles contractual “and” collecting signatures for referendums “that, in the end, even when you win, leave the time they find.
Another aspect, statements of Landini, concerns the right of representation of workers questioned by Renzi and that, according to the Secretary of Fiom, is a piece of a project that aims to “ cancellation of the unions ” and that poses serious problems “ defending democracy “in our country.
If this is the mother of all battles of Landini not understand why he” called “, in the historic home of former FLM Corso Trieste in Rome, only associations and organizations that are on the left of the Italian political scene.
Perhaps Typhoid think that “democracy” is a right and a value of only the left and not of all citizens, however think?
We also do this to Landini that in the last three years, the danger of an “anti-democratic” has been evoked, also with concern, by the opposition in Parliament and not certainly by the PD or the CGIL.
The Camusso seem pretty tight angle from the position taken in the last few hours by Landini, which is obvious, now drew the nut and can not go further back also in opposition to the CGIL itself.
It is clear that Typhoid is free to contrast with those who want to but it must do so in a transparent and above all consistent with the role that he plays within the CGIL.
If he wants to go to war (social) to Renzi can also use the union as he did, in Poland in the 80s, Lech Walesa cleanly and paying in person his choice.
Walesa, with his Solidarnosc, had the merit to drop communism and, although he failed to realize that the welfare state for which he had fought, he pointed not only to workers Poles, the way that you had to go to recover the rights that the regime had denied them .
Landini, however, if only caters to the left is bound to be neutralized by his own “comrades”.
If, however, intends to “aggregate” all those who identify in a broader social and free from political prejudice, should not other than to reject the temptations policies and create a “social coordination” bringing together all those, right (social), left (social) and center and that who care about the problem of “parliamentary representation” of workers and not the maintenance of the monopoly of the left on social issues.
The Secretary of Fiom remember that the only party which, at the beginning of each Legislature presented a draft law for the implementation of Article 46 of the Constitution which provides for the “profit sharing and management of the company” was the Italian Social Movement and had as first signatory Giorgio Almirante and as second signatory of the Secretary Gianni Cisnal Roberti who were not men left.
The Participation, so dear to Landini, must be a value that comes from below but if the same Landini begins with the logic of “Conventio exscludendum to” part with the foot wrong.
Lech Walesa has understood 30 years ago and has won but the Fiom not Solidarnosc Landini and not Walesa.
No comments:
Post a Comment