History article
Close
This article was published on 7 October 2014 at 15:26.
The last change is the 7 October 2014 at 20:49.
Seventeenth black smoke for the election of the two Constitutional Court judges by the Parliament in joint session. Pd and Forza Italy reiterated their congressmen and senators an indication of the ticket-Violante Caramazza. But neither of them has reached a quorum. A Violante went 506 votes to 422 Caramazza latter in the evening, after the second flop, announced the withdrawal of the candidature. In the last ballot, the candidate of the Democratic Party Violante had collected 511 preferences, while Ignazio Francesco Caramazza, former attorney general of the state, from Fi candidate after the withdrawal of Donato Bruno, received 450 votes. In front of the nth black smoke was attended by the President of the Republic Giorgio Napolitano worried that you defined for the stall, without hiding the bitterness of its appeals mumerosi inanscoltati. On Tuesday, Parliament will meet again for the eighteenth time to try to elect the two Constitutional Court judges.
Caramazza: my candidacy withdrawal
A few hours after the outcome of the vote , Scaramazza announced the step back. “I feel I must give up my application to the constitutional court – told ANSA – to avoid further entanglements of my name in maneuvers which I consider not in line with the proper functioning of the institutions.” Caramazza is the third candidate to force Italy to withdraw from the race due to the Consultation lack of a quorum. Before him, the Parliament had rejected the nominations of Antonio Catricalà and Donato Bruno. All three course associated with the candidacy of the Democratic Party of Luciano Violante, then still far in the distance.
Napolitano: saddened and concerned about the stalemate
bitterness and bewilderment were expressed, after yet another black smoke from the head of state. “It is saddening and worries that Parliament will auto-free as well, to a substantial degree, the powers granted by the Constitution to assist in the training of the highest institution of warranty. It is for me a source of bitter reflection of the fact that recently earned him my repeated, objective and disinterested stress, “he wrote in a statement the President of the Republic.
Fragmentation and conflict in the viewfinder
Napolitano has condemned “the fragmentation and conflict that mark the parliamentary factions,” responsible “even once have prevented the achievement of convergence necessary for the election of the two constitutional judges chambers which should have been provided since June 12. ” And he warned: “Two other members of the Court, appointed by the president, are about to conclude the mandate, but their successors shall be appointed as soon as possible.” The Chamber of Napolitano to Parliament to push ahead to the economy of the two judges of the consultation occurred on September 17.
Brunette asks verification titles Violante
Meanwhile, the president of the Members of Fi, Renato Brunetta, has called for the verification of their Luciano Violante to go to See at the meeting of leaders in the House. “Our candidate is eligible. I do not know the others … “was the reply dried Democratic Party leader in the Senate Luigi Zanda. Doubts about the requirements of the former Speaker of the House, nominated by the Democratic Party to the constitutional court, had been advanced in recent days by Movement 5 stars and the same Beppe Grillo via his blog.
CSM, Tuesday Parliament passes new member
In the afternoon, a joint House and Senate leaders set for next Tuesday at 11 the joint session of Parliament to elect the new component of the CSM. Election required after the plenum of the CSM has established the inability, due to lack of requirements of the Neapolitan Professor Teresa Well, appointed by Parliament in proportion to the palace of the Marshals Pd.
Well: Rooms suspend election to replace me
In two documents, Bene has asked the Parliament in joint session to suspend voting on the CSM waiting for it to decide on the appeal presented. It has challenged the decision of the CSM on the merits and in the method. In particular, Professor (indicated by the Keeper of Orlando to go to the CSM in share Pd) argues that in deciding on the securities should not be the CSM, but the Parliament. Then he criticized the manner in which it was said that ‘no’ because it does not allow rebuttal. It has also asked for his opinion on the matter to the legislative offices of the House and Senate, asking, finally, the suspension of voting rights. But Boldrini and Fat rejected in toto instances of Professor, stabililendo that Parliament should proceed anyway to ‘election of the secular component of the CSM and is not going to the Chambers decide on the suitability of candidates’ qualifications. Do not not give up Well (“Parliament should regain its prerogatives’), which ensures that it will not stop.
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Permalink
No comments:
Post a Comment