Tuesday, August 30, 2016

D’Alema against Renzi. Ie against himself – Vvox

If you like sarcasm to shovel, saccenza tons, the dialectic consummate showman, and try to let it get to tell masochistic taste from a man confident intellectual depth as now few political arena then listen to Massimo D’Alema is a pleasure that you can not deprive yourself. Rage yesterday evening on the festival stage “Fornaci Rosse” in Vicenza for his part: massacring the “boy constitutional reform” Matteo Renzi, defined “useless and confusing”, and through the “conjunction with electoral law, it is meant only to provide the power of a person “, in the most perfect” Berlusconi “even if the results; contrasting the approach of the 1948 Constituent Assembly, with “De Gasperi and Togliatti who jointly wrote the Constitution during the Cold War” , to that of a yes / no vote on 44 articles edited in one fell swoop , in which he, President of the Foundation Italianeuropei, counter-propose “half a page changing only 3 items”; tearing up the “nuovismo” the prime minister and secretary of the Democratic Party , going to hunt down and ridicule the afterword renziana the classic “Right and Left” Norberto Bobbio, in which the discriminant rottamatore Florentine replaced the equality / inequality with that, objectively childish, old / new; denouncing the “disintegration” of his party the last administration, with resounding defeats in Turin and Rome; warning those who, even in public, fears a return of the right to the government in case of victory of the rejection of the Constitutional referendum: “with the Italicum you go to the ballot with the Movement 5 Stars, and we have balottaggi already lost 19 out of 20 “; setting a maximum to stigmatize the renzismo that intruppa the Verdini and alienates the people left, “the identity is not what you do but who you are”; telling maliciously tasty anecdote Palmiro, a “mate”, medieval knight dressed in Narni, stops him to tell him that he, his wife, his sons, his daughters and all his relatives most will not vote for the Democratic Party, “now or ever.”

amusingly devious, the Baffino. And absolutely indisputable the merits . But, I know, very incomplete upon himself. Because while Renzi side is definitely casual ideologically, politically cynical, humanly arrogant, the other all these features could well be attributed to him, to D’Alema. It was not him in the late 90s to embrace The “third way” with Clinton and Blair, a kind of ultra-left and moderate temperate liberal, he wanted to incorporate the center to snatch votes right, through old model of social democracy and demolishing the historical identity with strokes of precarizzanti Treu packages (prodiana inheritance) and the NATO bombing of Serbia, to name but two sensational? Was it not he who had banded together with Berlusconi, finishing at the end downloaded, attempting a constitutional reform in the sense decisionist (exact same goal hated Renzi), differentiating it chose to do so with a bicameral committee rather than the chance of a referendum ( which in any case should have been done)? It was not the Commander in Chief to fall on the regional elections of 2000 because you had proudly tied the fate of its executive, for more born two years before the rubble of the Prodi government, in a change of guard at the inner center that, in contrast to piccate dalemiane reconstructions, someone recalled that between Renzi and Letta?

it will also be a statesman, D’Alema, when compared with the beardless Renzi. Certainly, the cultured and intelligent ( too smart, so much to combinarne catastrophic, first of all for himself ), the fine minds D’Alema stands among the dwarves who populate today the Palace. But in reality the bile dripping from his mouth comes from envy to a boy in Florence who might be able to accomplish what he wanted to accomplish. Only he, certain shoot, and some fake naivete from novus homo of the policy could not afford them, can not make people forget (though neither wanting it) his past as a communist leader since already when I was a child. Burns to die, Maximus, teenage freedom of speech and action of Matthew. That’s why now is arguing and pointing out that now he – implied: last – have it, not having more seats in the party to defend and, he says, no political aspiration to pursue. There’s nothing to do even the finest brains pay a pledge to their deepest feelings . Last night, D’Alema was a distillation of pure and understandable envy.

(ph: Ansa / Samantha Zucchi through huffingtonpost.it)

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment