Accompanied by the Minister Madia pads State Accounting. Stop to two rules of competitiveness dl, upon which the government places trust. Removed the limit of 68 years was added for university professors and doctors. The opposition protest, even some skeptics Pd
MILAN – Green light of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs of the Senate’s amendments to the government on the dl Public Administration. They jump so unlocking for four retirements in the school (at 96) and the threshold of 68 years to retirement office of university professors and primary. Deleted even stop the penalties for those who retire at age 62.
The classroom has passed the examination on the merits in the evenings, but ok is scheduled for tomorrow, Tuesday, August 5: assume that the government will ask the trust. The discussion will resume at 9.30. Committee has been approved, it is reported by the senators, including an agenda that calls on the government to find a solution to the question ‘at 96′ for retirement in the school, a solution that Renzi promised his will by August, and will cover a wider audience of four thousand today.For the Assistant Secretary of the Democratic Party Lorenzo Guerini “the issue will be addressed in an ad hoc decree because you have to solve a problem upstream that had been caused by the law Fornero on teachers. E ‘ a step that will address why it is not correct that workers pay. “
day. In the morning, the government had announced its decision to introduce” 4 amendments suppressive “just to cancel the proposals. The “96 share” was, in fact, the subject of the ire of commissioner spending
Carlo Cottarelli reviews that complained about the inability to cut taxes (original ultimate goal of spending cuts) if the policy had continued to ask for divert resources elsewhere.
make the government change their minds, however, were the findings of the above State Accounting Office had shown that the norm among those at fault coverage. A government amendment to the current law also revise the age limit for retirement office, eliminating the limit of 68 years was added for university professors and doctors. There remain, however, the thresholds for the rest of government employees (62 years and 65 doctors).
dl competitiveness. The clash between the government and the State Accounting, however, it has also expanded to dl Competitiveness , to the point of forcing the House Budget Committee that was to provide the opinion to the text of the decree before the House to suspend its work. From the Accounting Department had in fact received any doubts about an amendment on the photovoltaic and a rule concerned the Deposits and Loans Fund. The Commission also endorsed the observations of Accounting and forced the House to postpone the decree relevant committees, which have been modified those two points. To be precise, the photovoltaic regards the cadastral income of the property with plants, while the one on the CDP (we are talking about the reduction of the issued securities) must be subject to the EU’s go-ahead. The bill is then returned to the classroom, where the government has placed its trust. Probably the work will be postponed until the morning. The problem of dl Pa. With regard to Decree-Madia on public administration, had been thought in order to modernize the civil servants through a maxi-early retirement of state of 62 years that would have resulted in an increase in expenses for the state coffers. The rule would save 4,000 teachers, were “stranded” in 2012, which would be given the chance to go this year to retire under the old rules of pre-Fornero “at 96″. An operation that costs 396 million from this year to 2018. Likely that the government now asks confidence in the Senate on the measure: “We have to run and, at this point, since it’s been put to the House , it seems reasonable, “the minister said Madia. In the classroom, however, is looming battle. Also unhappy with the opposition, in particular Sel: “The Government of ads just struck again. For school workers ‘share 96′ runs again the sacred right to retire.” But Forza Italy is not at all convinced: a decision “shameful when he won the bureaucracy.” Particular the fact that the grunts also come from a part of the deputies of the Democratic Party. In seven are asking the government to reconsider, they also talking about the victory of the cold numbers of bureaucracy over common sense. For CGIL, however, “is very serious delete operations on the pensions.” The question also filter out the words of the Prime Minister, Matteo Renzi. “The amendment to ‘share 96′ had nothing to do with the ratio of the reform of P. A – would have told the Prime Minister – and then it was right to remove it from the decree.”
No comments:
Post a Comment